Invalidation is a procedure leading to the determination that a protective right for a trademark should not have n granted. If the application is successful, the effect is very significant – the trademark is treated as if it had never n effectively registered. We are talking about a “retroactive” effect, i.e., from the moment the protective right was granted. In Poland, cases concerning national trademarks are handled by the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland. In the case of a European Union trademark, the competent authority is the European Union Intellectual Property Office. The procedure is contentious – one party submits an application, and the other party can defend itself, presenting arguments and evidence.
The basis for invalidation is most often so-called absolute or relative grounds for refusal of registration.
The most common reasons include lack of distinctiveness, a descriptive character of the mark, misleading consumers as to the origin or characteristics of the goods, conflict with public order, or prior rights of another entity – for example, a prior trademark, a well-known brand, or the right to a company name.
It is important to distinguish between two concepts: invalidation and lapse. Invalidation applies to situations where the defect already existed at the time of registration. Lapse refers to subsequent events, such as the non-use of the trademark for a specified period.
This distinction has practical significance. If the problem is that the trademark is not used in commerce for the required period, the appropriate course of action is to file a request for lapse. However, if the registration initially infringed on the rights of others or was contrary to the regulations, invalidation would be the appropriate remedy.
The invalidation procedure is administrative and contentious in nature. After the application is filed, the office serves it on the trademark owner, who may submit their position.
The decision may be appealed to an administrative court.
Therefore, the dispute may be multi-stage and require a well-thought-out strategy.
The consequences are far-reaching. The protective right “disappears” from the register retroactively. The trademark owner loses the monopoly on using the mark within the scope of the registration. This can have business, reputational, and even financial consequences.
In practice, the annulment can be a turning point in a dispute between competitors. It can open the way for pursuing civil claims, renegotiating licensing agreements, or changing the brand strategy.
The owner of the trademark is not defenseless. They can demonstrate that their mark has distinctive character, that it is not misleading, and that the similarity to an earlier mark is not significant enough to create a risk of confusion.
In some situations, the passage of time and the tolerance of the use of the mark by the earlier rights holder are also relevant. Each case requires individual analysis.
The institution of invalidation plays an important role in the trademark protection system. On the one hand, it protects entrepreneurs from the unfair registration of marks that infringe their rights. On the other hand, it serves as a mechanism for streamlining the register by eliminating marks that do not meet the statutory requirements.
For an entrepreneur, this means the need for strategic thinking already at the stage of filing a trademark application. Careful analysis of availability, assessment of the risk of conflict, and proper selection of the scope of protection minimize the likelihood of a later dispute.
The decision to initiate proceedings should be preceded by an analysis of the chances of success and the business consequences. An administrative dispute requires time and commitment, but in many cases it is an effective tool for defending a brand. Sometimes, the very initiative of submitting an application leads to negotiations and an agreement between the parties. However, sometimes a dispute is unavoidable, especially when a strong, recognizable brand is at stake.
Invalidation of a trademark is definitely possible and, in certain circumstances, can be effective. Registration does not provide an absolute guarantee of the inviolability of the right. The system provides mechanisms for controlling and correcting decisions if it turns out that the trademark should not have n granted protection. Awareness of this institution is an element of mature brand management. In a world of intense competition and the increasing number of trademark applications, the ability to assess when it is worth using the invalidation instrument can be crucial for the safety and development of the business.
Fill out the form, and we will get back to you within the next 1-2 business days with a preliminary quote.
