In Poland, this issue is regulated by the Act on Combating Unfair Competition. This Act defines an act of unfair competition as an action that is contrary to law or good morals and which threatens or infringes the interests of another entrepreneur or customer.
Unfair competition can take many forms. It often involves actions that, at first glance, appear to be “aggressive marketing,” but in reality violate the law.
A typical example is the misleading designation of a company or product. If a company deliberately uses a name, graphic design, or communication similar to that of a competitor in order to benefit from its recognition, this may be considered an act of unfair competition.
A similar situation arises when false information about a competitor is disseminated. Publicly questioning the quality of products or the reliability of a company, if not based on facts, may harm its reputation and economic interests.
An act of unfair competition may also involve hindering access to the market, for example, by inducing counterparties to terminate contracts, using unfair contractual terms, or parasitically copying essential elements of a product.
The line between unfair competition and infringement of intellectual property rights can be thin. For example, using someone else’s trademark may simultaneously infringe on the trademark and constitute an act of unfair competition.
In practice, there is often a cumulative effect of claims. An entrepreneur may rely on both the provisions concerning trademarks and the provisions on combating unfair competition. The choice of strategy depends on the specific facts of the case.
The market allows for tough, even aggressive competition. Comparing products and highlighting price or quality advantages is generally legal, as long as it is done fairly and does not mislead.
Comparative advertising is permissible, but it must meet certain conditions – primarily, it must be based on objective and verifiable criteria. If the message suggests false information or deliberately disparages a competitor, it may cross the line of legality.
It is crucial to assess whether the action is contrary to good practices and whether it actually threatens the interests of another entrepreneur.
The first step is to gather evidence. This may include advertising materials, screenshots from websites, correspondence with customers, contracts, or expert opinions. In business disputes, documentation is of great importance. Next, it is necessary to assess whether the given behavior actually meets the criteria for an act of unfair competition. The mere fact that a competitor is successful does not mean that the law has n violated. It is necessary to demonstrate the unlawfulness of the action and the connection between that action and the infringement of the entrepreneur’s interests.
The primary legal avenue is civil proceedings. An entrepreneur whose interests have n infringed can bring specific claims before a court. They can demand the cessation of unlawful actions, the removal of their effects, the submission of a statement of appropriate content, compensation for damages under general principles, or the return of unjustly obtained benefits. In some situations, it is also possible to secure claims even before a judgment is issued, which is particularly important in dynamic advertising campaigns or the sale of disputed products.
The Act also provides for criminal liability in certain cases, e.g., in the event of disclosing trade secrets or labeling goods in a way that is misleading as to their origin. However, criminal proceedings do not replace civil claims – often both procedures operate in parallel.
In some cases, the actions of an entrepreneur may violate not only the interests of a competitor but also the collective interests of consumers. In such cases, the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection has jurisdiction.
The President of the UOKiK may conduct administrative proceedings, impose financial penalties, and require entrepreneurs to change their market practices. However, this mainly concerns the relationship between entrepreneur and consumer, and not typical disputes between companies.
Disputes over unfair competition can be complex and costly. Therefore, in many cases, it is worth considering sending a warning letter or attempting mediation beforehand. Sometimes, a professional letter from an attorney is enough to resolve the dispute.
On the other hand, a lack of reaction may be interpreted as consent. If a competitor consistently builds its position at the expense of your brand, a quick and decisive response may be crucial.
In a dynamic business environment, it is easy to cross the line. Intense promotion, copying trends, or drawing inspiration from market solutions are not prohibited in themselves. The problem arises when the action becomes parasitic, misleads customers, or intentionally harms a competitor.
Therefore, it is important not only to react to infringements but also to build your own strategy in a legally safe manner. An audit of marketing activities, appropriate product labeling, or clear agreements with contractors can reduce the risk of being both a victim and a perpetrator of unfair competition.
Unfair competition is a real threat to entrepreneurs, but at the same time, it is an area in which the law offers effective protection tools. The Act on Combating Unfair Competition allows for the pursuit of claims and, in certain cases, also provides for criminal liability.
The key is a quick reaction, a proper procedural strategy, and reliable documentation of infringements. Competition is the foundation of the economy – but only when it remains fair.
Fill out the form, and we will get back to you within the next 1-2 business days with a preliminary quote.
